Topics of Interest

Hunters up in arms over new hunting regs

By Joan Silver
100 Mile House Free Press

July 28, 2009

Local hunters are upset with this year’s hunting regulations.

Jude Dion, Exeter Sporting Goods owner, called the regs “ridiculous” and totally one-sided.

“We can kill them on the highway but it’s not okay to eat them,” he said.

He said the new regs mean hunters can only shoot one buck instead of the usual two and this is the only area in the province that doesn’t have an immature moose season.

Dion said the area needs an open doe season to resolve concerns about the buck and doe ratio.

“It really takes away from meat hunters for locals who don’t care about the antlers,” he said.

“It seems to be going all kaflooey when you can only have one four-point buck,” said Dion.

Jacques Drisdelle, BC Wildlife Federation (BCWF) Cariboo/Chilcotin regional president, said the Ministry of Environment regional wildlife branch made a proposal to reduce the mule deer buck season from two bucks to one buck effective this year.

“In consultation with the regional wildlife manager we were told that the reason for this proposal was to bring the buck to doe ratio more in-line with ministry policy of 25 bucks to 100 does,” he said.

He said the BCWF protested this proposal for a number of reasons.

Drisdelle said the mule deer population in the Cariboo region is healthy and, in many cases, very high.

He said the methodology used by the ministry for determining the buck to doe ratio is flawed.

They conduct deer counts in open fields at the end of the hunting season during the day in specific locations but not representative of every area of the region.

Based on what they count during one day they make their determination and it is not based on sound scientific methods.

“One could do the same sort of count on a different day and find the buck to doe ratio higher or lower. It doesn’t make sense,” said Drisdelle.

He said, in region 5, there was originally a four-point or higher buck season during the entire month of November.

The ministry changed that to extend the “any buck” season to Nov. 20 and then opened the second season starting Nov. 21 for four-point or better bucks. This, in effect, made every buck vulnerable during the peak rut season.

“This means that if — and I emphasize if — the buck ratio was adversely affected, it was from the direct result of the ministry experimenting with the four-point or better season during November,” said Drisdelle.

“Something that should never have happened and something that we objected to at the time.”

Drisdelle questions if the buck to doe ratio is down, as the regional Ministry of Environment claims, then why have they reduced the number of doe limited entry allocations for 2009.

He said that is exactly what they have done and it completely baffles the BCWF.

“It is our view that the local wildlife manager does not have the knowledge required to properly manage mule deer populations and that this recent effort is simply an exercise of chance rather than sound wildlife management practices,” he said.

Drisdelle said it’s equivalent to playing a game of horseshoes to see who gets closest to the pin.

He emphasized that the BCWF has made these views clearly known to the ministry at both the regional and provincial levels but have had no success in getting them to listen.

Drisdelle said the BCWF has been asking for an immature bull moose season for the region but the request has repeatedly fallen on deaf ears.

He said the ministry’s own numbers show there are approximately 27,390 moose in the Cariboo region and that number is progressively increasing.

He said the Thompson region, just to the south, has an open immature bull season from Sept. 20 to Oct. 31.

The Omineca region to the north has an immature bull season from Sept. 10 to Nov. 5 and also have an open calf season, a youth season, a bow only and a youth bow season.

“There is a ground swell of dissatisfaction over these closures imposed on BC residents because of a lack of will and a lack of sound wildlife management practices being exhibited by Ministry of Environment,” said Drisdelle.

*****************

BCWF ALERT
John B. Holdstock
BC Wildlife Federation
Kelowna, B.C.

The world is run by those who show up

Improved Management Proposal for Wild Steelhead in the Yakoun River

Submitted by the Port Clements Rod & Gun Club and endorsed by the B.C.Wildlife Federations “Inland Fisheries Committee” and “Tidal Water Fisheries Committee.”

The Ministry of Environment states that they do not have the funds to administer proper monitoring or enforcement to provide for retention fisheries on Wild Steelhead.

The direction set out in the draft “Vision Document” a triparty exercise between M.O.E., D.F.O. and the S.F.A.B. is that the community will play a more active roll in protecting habitat and promoting sustainable fisheries. Therefore the Port Clements Rod & Gun Club submits the following improved management proposal for Yakoun River Steelhead.

In any fishery knowing how many fish are in a system is key to proper fish management. Determining the number of fish in a system is a costly exercise and a major stumbling block in the Ministry of Environments ability to provide retention fisheries for Wild Steelhead.

We submit that the Port Clements, Rod & Gun Club seek funding for and hire a contractor to develop a habitat carrying capacity model for the Yakoun River.Some possible funding sources would be H.R.S.D.C. ,B.C.C.F. ,Walmart Green Fund and R.B.C.. Once that work has been completed and an estimate of returning adult Steelhead is established an accurate number can be set for harvest. If additional funding can be obtained, a mark recapture study should be conducted as well.

How does one know how many fish are being harvested?

For the 2008/2009 fishing season and while funding is sought for and the habitat caring capacity model is being developed we propose permits be issued for the retention of 50 Wild Steelhead from the Yakoun River. We propose that in addition to recording a retained Steelhead on your Steelhead license. You would need to acquire a permit.

These permits would be available only to holders of a B.C. Resident Fresh Water Angling License complete with a Steelhead stamp. These permits would be available on a first come first serve bases at three distribution centers on the Queen Charlotte Islands. You would only be allowed one permit for the 2008/2009 fishing season and you must obtain the permit in person. No reservations or third party pick up.

At the end of the season the completed permit must be returned to a pre-determined mailing address. (additional information could be recorded on these permits if beneficial ie. Length, girth, sex. )

Once the habitat caring capacity model is complete the number of retention permits can be adjusted accordingly.

Enforcement or lack there of can be a challenge to proper fish and wildlife management. Often Conservation Officers are tasked with patrolling vast areas with little manpower or funding.

Continue reading Improved Management Proposal for Wild Steelhead in the Yakoun River

Privatization of Resource Puts Public Fishery in Jeopardy

BCWF Press Release
February 20, 2009

Vancouver – “The decision of past federal Ministers of Fisheries to restrict the public fishery to a mere 12% of the total allowable catch (TAC) of halibut for the recreational fishery will result in significant reductions in limits and fishing time for anglers in 2009. This decision will have an immense adverse impact on the economic and social benefits derived from this fishery,” B.C. Wildlife Federation president Mel Arnold announced today.

“Considering that the allocation of halibut to public fisheries in jurisdictions south and north of B.C. are 51% and 20% respectively, we can only surmise that, by restricting the public¹s allocation to only 12% of TAC, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is deliberately and capriciously trying to minimize, if not eliminate entirely, the public fishery for halibut in the Pacific region of Canada,” Arnold warned.

Continue reading Privatization of Resource Puts Public Fishery in Jeopardy

Halibut: The Executive Study

History – ITQ or “ Defined Shares”

1)    For reasons of safety at sea and market stability for commercial fishermen, DFO introduced an individual vessel quota system (IVQ) some years ago in which each license holder received a share of the Canadian Total Allowable Catch (TAC) based on the average of his/her landings over a previous number of years. However, instead of leasing these quotas to commercial license holders annually and thereby obtaining rent for commercial access to this public resource, the Minister of the day decided, without any consultation with the Sport Fishing Advisory Board (SFAB), to simply “gift” the entire Canadian share of the TAC to individual halibut fishermen as Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQ’s) who qualified under the landing criteria for their private use in perpetuity. At that time the halibut catch in the public fishery was assumed to be so low that it was simply ignored. Since our fishery was to be saved “harmless” in this change, there was no need to comment. Using ITQ’s, DFO has also gifted 100% of the Sablefish and Geoduc TAC to the commercial sector. Again, the sport catch of both species is such a small percentage of the TAC’s that it was, and still is, ignored.

2)    By 2000, the commercial sector was concerned enough about the Public, Recreational Fishery, in their minds a re-allocation of their gifted quota, that they convinced DFO to strike a halibut allocation committee to establish a harvest sharing arrangement with our sector. The commercial harvesters wanted us capped at 5% of the TAC (at this time, we were unknowingly harvesting at least 7 or 8%) while we took the position that, since the resource was owned by the people of Canada, there should be no cap on the Public Fishery beyond reasonable bag/possession limits to prevent abuse of our right to harvest fish in tidal waters.

This stalemate was then turned over to an arbitrator for a decision and he recommended 9%. The DFO Minister of the day delivered an edict that capped public access to the resource at 12% of the TAC. At that time, DFO estimated our Recreational Sector was catching about 9% of the TAC, and their 12% decision, in their minds, gave us room for growth.

Minister Thibault also decided that part of the process in setting defined shares and fixed percentage allocation, any increase in catch requirements for the recreational sector beyond the 12% would have to be reached by the purchase of quota by the recreational sector from the commercial sector in a “market-based mechanism”

Unfortunately Minister Thibault, or his staff, failed to understand that the recreational community has no legal society or company, and therefore no means to raise or hold money, or purchase or lease anything.

Continue reading Halibut: The Executive Study

GOABC: Economic Viability Paper

Paper presented to the Ministry of Environment by the Guide-Outfitters Association of BC.

The Guide Outfitter Industry in British Columbia_Challenges and New Opportunities